Back to all discussions

  •   4 months ago

Unfair Judgement

With due respect, the results raise serious concerns about rule enforcement and fairness.

The submission guidelines clearly required a public GitHub repository and a Try-it-Out link. However, winning projects like Sketchrun and Rehearsal do not provide a public code repository, and Sketchrun does not even have a live app link. Selecting winners based purely on a video or idea directly violates the stated rules and makes the work unverifiable.

While other teams spent significant time designing architecture, building, publishing code, and deploying a live product while fully following every requirement. Ignoring mandatory criteria undermines the integrity of the hackathon and is unfair to teams that played by the rules.

We request a transparent explanation of how submissions that did not meet mandatory requirements were evaluated and selected.

  • 2 comments

  •   •   4 months ago

    Ya it was unfair

  • Manager   •   4 months ago

    Thank you for your feedback and participation. We understand and are sorry that you are not happy with the outcome. We assure you the judging process was conducted with integrity and adherence to the rules. We cannot share eligibility determinations (including both public and private components of a user’s submission) with third parties. We’re very grateful for the time and effort you put into your project.

Comments are closed.